Y. Mushiake, $B!H(BLog-Periodic Structure Provides |
|||||
The Journal of The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication
Engineers, Vol. 82, No. 5, pp. 510-511, May 1999 [1]. |
|||||
This is a short note in Japanese that was prepared to refute a falsified and wrong explanation [2, 3] about the broad-band property of $B!H(BSelf-complementary Antennas$B!I(B. | |||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Fig. 2: A comparison of the measured input resistances.
|
|||||
The measured input resistances for these two antennas are compared in Fig. 2. The results show that the value of input resistance for the antenna 1B which is arranged in anti-complementary manner varies distinctively with the source frequency, while it remain almost constant for the antenna 1A which is arranged in self-complementary manner. This test shows that the incorrectly arranged log-periodic antennas are indisputably not frequency-independent. Furthermore, it can be well understood from the results of these measurements that the $B!H(BPrinciple of self-complementarity$B!I(B is an undoubtedly useful principle for extremely broad-band antennas. |
|||||
References. 1. Y. Mushiake, $B!H(BConstant-impedance antennas,$B!I(B J. IECE Japan, 48, 4, pp. 580-584, April 1965. 2. P. E. Mayes, $B!H(BFrequency-independent antennas and broad-band derivatives
thereof,$B!I(B Proc. IEEE, 80, pp. 103-112, January, 1992. |
|||||
The two figures in this note are reproduced from his old paper published in April ![]() |
|||||
Self-Complementary Antenna | |||||
Top Page |